oldorop osingoi and 32 others vs mrs sara benedict losurutia 2021 tzhc 2787 26 february 2021

oldorop osingoi and 32 others vs mrs sara benedict losurutia 2021 tzhc 2787 26 february 2021

Applicants failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide evidence of when rectified copies were received, making it impossible for the court to determine sufficiency of cause for delay. Application dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
oldorop osingoi and 32 others vs mrs sara benedict losurutia 2021 tzhc 2787 26 february 2021
Parties
Applicant: Oldorop O Singoi; Applicant: Palalet Orkisongoi; Applicant: Malipe Ndaine; Applicant: Parmelo Ndaine; Applicant: Mbambile Loitesoi; Applicant: Orbulaa Lekinangm; Applicant: Saidi Lulunge; Applicant: Itesoi Mbuki; Applicant: Sokoyet Itesoi; Applicant: Malipe Lemamai; Applicant: Ndunu Noomisigio; Applicant: Olopinyo Mepukori; Applicant: Noomisxgo Mari; Applicant: Sinjore Karpai; Applicant: Shangiki Mepukori; Applicant: Sona Sinjori; Applicant: Orapit Miraa; Applicant: Leyaseki Mocko; Applicant: Ngayeni Orapit; Applicant: Moringe Lo Olo; Applicant: Smaili Logngulaani; Applicant: Masiaya Mock; Applicant: Oloipuki Morloo; Applicant: Machiga Kipareni; Applicant: Lanyor Kiroiya; Applicant: Ngushan Masiaya; Applicant: Seremunai Karpapai; Applicant: Njumali Orpinyo; Applicant: Sasine Kasaru; Applicant: Ndiyai Karpapai; Applicant: Kimeni Merpukori; Applicant: Letisa Itesoi; Applicant: Maingwa Arapiti; Respondent: Mrs Sara Benedict Losurutia
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Accounting for Delay
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Accounting for Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oldorop O Singoi

Applicant

Palalet Orkisongoi

Applicant

Malipe Ndaine

Applicant

Parmelo Ndaine

Applicant

Mbambile Loitesoi

Applicant

Orbulaa Lekinangm

Applicant

Saidi Lulunge

Applicant

Itesoi Mbuki

Applicant

Sokoyet Itesoi

Applicant

Malipe Lemamai

Applicant

Ndunu Noomisigio

Applicant

Olopinyo Mepukori

Applicant

Noomisxgo Mari

Applicant

Sinjore Karpai

Applicant

Shangiki Mepukori

Applicant

Sona Sinjori

Applicant

Orapit Miraa

Applicant

Leyaseki Mocko

Applicant

Ngayeni Orapit

Applicant

Moringe Lo Olo

Applicant

Smaili Logngulaani

Applicant

Masiaya Mock

Applicant

Oloipuki Morloo

Applicant

Machiga Kipareni

Applicant

Lanyor Kiroiya

Applicant

Ngushan Masiaya

Applicant

Seremunai Karpapai

Applicant

Njumali Orpinyo

Applicant

Sasine Kasaru

Applicant

Ndiyai Karpapai

Applicant

Kimeni Merpukori

Applicant

Letisa Itesoi

Applicant

Maingwa Arapiti

Applicant

Mrs Sara Benedict Losurutia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants adduced sufficient reasons to warrant extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide evidence of when rectified copies were received, making it impossible for the court to determine sufficiency of cause for delay. Application dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • application dismissed with costs