Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

summary Judg

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Defendant's failure to defend the summary suit results in deemed admission of the plaintiffs' claims, warranting summary judgment for the claimed amount, interest, and costs.

Court disposition

Summary judgment entered for plaintiffs against defendant.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Tshs. 50,70,481.60 to 1st plaintiff.
  • Defendant to pay interest at 15% per annum from accrual to judgment date.
  • Defendant to pay interest at 7% per annum from judgment date until full satisfaction.
  • Defendant to pay costs of the suit.

02

Material facts

Parties

The Attorney General

1st Plaintiff

The Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund

2nd Plaintiff

Olwethu Company Ltd The Great Lakes

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Unremitted Statutory Contributions Plus Penalties: TZS 5,070,481.6
  • Interest Rate (pre Judgment): % 15
  • Interest Rate (post Judgment): % 7

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Summary Suit / Summary Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiffs claim for payment of unremitted statutory contributions and accumulated penalties, supported by statutory obligation and demand letter.
Respondent
Defendant defaulted and did not apply for leave to defend; no arguments presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code

    Where a summary suit is not defended, allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted.

  2. 02

    Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund & Another vs Rutta Stewart Mukulasi T/A Mujumuzi Secondary School (Civil Case No. 1332 of 2025) [2025] TZHC 304

    Summary judgment promotes judicial efficiency by preventing frivolous defences in cases involving clear monetary obligations.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Defendant's failure to defend the summary suit results in deemed admission of the plaintiffs' claims, warranting summary judgment for the claimed amount, interest, and costs.

Obiter and limits

  • Summary judgment is designed to promote judicial efficiency by preventing defendants from raising frivolous defences in cases involving liquidated demands.

Court disposition

Summary judgment entered for plaintiffs against defendant.

  • Defendant to pay Tshs. 50,70,481.60 to 1st plaintiff.
  • Defendant to pay interest at 15% per annum from accrual to judgment date.
  • Defendant to pay interest at 7% per annum from judgment date until full satisfaction.
  • Defendant to pay costs of the suit.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 27 February 2025

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 27 February 2025

summary Judg

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM SUB-REGISTRY)

AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 7952 OF 2024 CASE REF. NO. 202404151000007952 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ---------------------------------------1ST PLAINTIFF

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND---------------------------2ND PLAINTIFF

VERSUS OLWETHU COMPANY LTD THE GREAT LAKES---------------------DEFENDANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT: 12th & 27 th Feb. 2025 KIREKIANO, J : The plaintiffs instituted a civil suit under summary procedure against the defendant, claiming, among other things, for payment of Tshs. 50,70,481.60/= (Tanzanian Shillings Fifty Million, Seven Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-one and sixty cents only), being unremitted members’ contributions plus accumulated penalties. The second plaintiff is a government corporation and a social Security Fund/scheme established under the National Social Security Fund Act [Cap 50 R.E 2018]. The defendant is a company incorporated under the 1 laws of Tanzania and registered as a contributing member employer of the 2nd plaintiff with Registration No. 1009589. It is contended that, under the laws establishing the 2nd plaintiff, the defendant is obliged to remit members’ contributions each month, 10% of the employee's gross salary and 10% by the employer, making a total of 20%. The defendant thus defaulted on the remittance of members’ principal contributions for the periods between January 2018 and September 2023 and, as a result, attracted the penalty amounting to TZS 6,807,129.60/=. It is further revealed that the 1st plaintiff reminded the defendant through a demand letter dated 05/12/2022 to perform the said statutory obligation on remittance of the member’s

contribution to no avail. The plaintiffs have filed a summary suit against the defendants, praying for the following reliefs. i) That, the defendant be ordered to pay the sum of Tshs. 50,70,481.60/= (Tanzanian Shillings Fifty Million, Seven Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-one and sixty cents only), being un-remitted members’ statutory contributions and accumulated penalties thereon due and payable to the first plaintiff by the defendant. 2 ii) The defendant pays interest on the decree sum from January 2018, when the sum accrued to the date of judgment, at an overall lending interest rate of 15% per annum, as published by the Bank of Tanzania monthly Economic Review, January 2018 publications. iii) Interest on the decretal sum at the prescribed court rate of 7% per annum from the date of delivery of Judgment until the same shall be fully satisfied. iv) Cost of and incidental to the filing of the suit; and v) Any other and further relief this Honourable Court may deem fit and to grant. Upon service, the defendant defaulted in applying for leave to defend the suit, and the counsel for the plaintiff prayed for summary judgment. I have examined the plaint; the total outstanding contributions plus accumulated penalties are Tshs. 50,70,481.60/= (Tanzanian Shillings Fifty Million, Seven Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-one and sixty cents only), which is the default

remittance members’ principal contribution plus the accumulated penalties. As provided under Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, where a summary suit is not defended, the allegations in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. This is the position of the law elucidated in numerous decisions, including CRDB Bank Limited vs John Kagimbo Lwambagaza 3 [2002] TLR117. But also The Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund & Another vs Rutta Stewart Mukulasi T/A Mujumuzi Secondary School (Civil Case No. 1332 of 2025) [2025] TZHC 304 (18 February 2025), in the later case, Mwakapeje J, stated that; This principle is designed to promote judicial efficiency by preventing defendants from raising frivolous defences that could unnecessarily delay the resolution of cases involving liquidated demands, promissory notes, and other clear monetary obligations as stipulated under Order XXXV Rule 1. With that remark and based on the foregoing, I enter summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant as follows.

1. The defendant is to pay the 1st plaintiff Tshs. 50,70,481.60/= (Tanzanian Shillings Fifty Million, Seven Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-one and sixty cents only), the default remittance members’ principal contribution plus the accumulated penalties.

2. Interest on the decretal sum of 15% from when the sum accrued to the date of judgment.

3. Interest on the decretal sum at the court rate of 7% per annum from this date of Judgment until final payment.

4. Costs of this suit. 4 Dated at DAR ES SALAAM this 27th day of February 2025. A. J. KIREKIANO.

JUDGE 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

CRDB Bank Limited vs John Kagimbo Lwambagaza [2002] TLR117

Case cited

Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund & Another vs Rutta Stewart Mukulasi T/A Mujumuzi Secondary School (Civil Case No. 1332 of 2025) [2025] TZHC 304

Case cited

National Social Security Fund Act [Cap 50 R.E 2018]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.