19930807 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Convictions of Kessi and Selina were based solely on Omari's extrajudicial statement, which was not a confession and inadmissible against them; conflict of interest deprived Omari of adequate defence; evidence against Omari was weak and retrial not in interest of justice.
- Citation
- 19930807 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Omari Issa Mohamed; Appellant: Kessi Omari Selina; Appellant: Selina Ali Naboga; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Conflict of Interest, Admissibility of Evidence, Retracted Statements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Omari Issa Mohamed
Appellant
Kessi Omari Selina
Appellant
Selina Ali Naboga
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conflict of interest affected the fairness of trial for Omari Issa Mohamed
- 2 Whether the extrajudicial statement of Omari was admissible against Kessi and Selina
- 3 Whether conviction based on retracted and uncorroborated extrajudicial statement is valid
Ratio Decidendi
Convictions of Kessi and Selina were based solely on Omari's extrajudicial statement, which was not a confession and inadmissible against them; conflict of interest deprived Omari of adequate defence; evidence against Omari was weak and retrial not in interest of justice.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Convictions of all appellants quashed
- Death sentences set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment