omari juma jabiri others vs hadija omari others 2014 tzhc 2114 11 july 2014
Appellant failed to prove by documentary evidence that the disputed land belonged to his late father; evidence showed it was clan land jointly occupied by family members. Appellant was only administrator of his father's estate, not grandfather's. Respondent's evidence was heavier; appeal dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- omari juma jabiri others vs hadija omari others 2014 tzhc 2114 11 july 2014
- Parties
- Appellant: Omari Juma Jabiri; 1st Respondent: Hadija Omari; 2nd Respondent: Omari Kassim; Respondent: Bakari Juma
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Clan Land, Administration of Estate, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Omari Juma Jabiri
Appellant
Hadija Omari
1st Respondent
Omari Kassim
2nd Respondent
Bakari Juma
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Case Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disputed land is clan land or part of the estate of the late Jabiri Tuwa
- 2 Whether the appellant is administrator of both his father's and grandfather's estates
- 3 Whether the respondent's father invaded the suit land
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant failed to prove by documentary evidence that the disputed land belonged to his late father; evidence showed it was clan land jointly occupied by family members. Appellant was only administrator of his father's estate, not grandfather's. Respondent's evidence was heavier; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- appeal dismissed
- costs awarded to respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment