omary abdallah mbwangwa vs republic 2019 tzca 528 5 march 2019

omary abdallah mbwangwa vs republic 2019 tzca 528 5 march 2019

The omission to cite subsection (3) of section 131 in the charge did not prejudice the appellant or cause miscarriage of justice, as the particulars and evidence sufficiently informed him of the offence and potential sentence; the defect was curable under section 388 of the CPA.

Citation
omary abdallah mbwangwa vs republic 2019 tzca 528 5 march 2019
Parties
Appellant: Omary Abdallah @ Mbwangwa; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Defective Charge, Sentencing, Burden of Proof
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Omary Abdallah @ Mbwangwa

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether the trial court properly convicted the appellant
  3. 3 Whether the charge was incurably defective for failing to cite the correct sentencing provision

Ratio Decidendi

The omission to cite subsection (3) of section 131 in the charge did not prejudice the appellant or cause miscarriage of justice, as the particulars and evidence sufficiently informed him of the offence and potential sentence; the defect was curable under section 388 of the CPA.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence of life imprisonment confirmed