19941202 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 19941202 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 2 December 1994
- Posture
- Matrimonial Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 2 December 1994
- Posture
- Matrimonial Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The marriage was irreparably broken due to frequent quarrels and serious allegations, with failed reconciliation efforts; therefore, the decree of divorce is upheld.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- marriage dissolved
- decision of lower courts upheld
02
Material facts
Parties
Omary Abdallah
AppellantMwashamba Omari
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Matrimonial Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the marriage between the parties should be dissolved due to irreconcilable differences and allegations of witchcraft
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant challenged the decree of divorce issued by the primary court and upheld by the district court, denying responsibility for the deaths of the children and witchcraft allegations.
- Respondent
- Respondent alleged that the appellant caused the death of their children by witchcraft, leading to irreconcilable differences and separation.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Tanzanian family law
Marriage may be dissolved if irretrievable breakdown is established and reconciliation efforts fail.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The marriage was irreparably broken due to frequent quarrels and serious allegations, with failed reconciliation efforts; therefore, the decree of divorce is upheld.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- marriage dissolved
- decision of lower courts upheld
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 2 December 1994
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 2 December 1994
IN THE HIGH COUP..T OF TA~ZANIA
AT DAR ES SALAAM PC. MATtlMONIAL CIVIL APPEAL N0.15/88 (From the decision of ~~strict Court of Morogo.ro Dist~ict at Moro€,'oroLCivil Appeal No. 37 of 1988 Original Civil C~se No. 42 of 1988 of Primary Court l'forogoro, OMARY ABDALLl-i.F ~ •• ♦ I. 0. 0 0 o e. 0. ~ •••••.••• AIPELLANT versus MWASHAMBA OI1iillI • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • • • • . . • • RESPONDENT JUDuMENT ..MhIN.A , J •. . 1':1.L1. This is a second appeal bS Omari A~dallah against the decree of divorce issued by the urban primary court, Morogoro. His appeal to the die~rict court was dismi.sse<l. The evic'.ence established tha1· the appellant was married to the respondent, MwashaJJil:)a Omari in 1979 under Islamj_c law, and there were three children to the marriage. Two of the children ci;ied 1 and there were allegations by the respondent that tle appellant caused the death cf the children by witchcraft. These.allega- tions caused misunderstandings betwee~ the parties and frequent quarrels, and finally separa~~on. The allegation.that the appellant ·11as practising witchcraft was supported by Maangaza.Mwu..yimvua who said that the appellant admitted hew~~ uaing instruments of witchcraft; but denied having caused . deaths of his children, This was a case where the parties could not 'be reconciled because of frequent quarrels over petty matters. Efforts to reconcile them failed. In fact the respondent had left
the matrirrionia1. home for go.od •••.. /2 since 1988 because of her belief that the hu~band had ·bewitched the childrun who died. The marriage had irreparably broken <.J·::n and· there was nothing which could be done to sa,re that marriage. I uphold the decision of the l0w0~ courts which dissolved .. the marriage .. The appollant has not raised any matters_ of substance in thJ wemorandum of appealo The appeal -:·., .. ·dismiss.eel. tlA4A.M- w. J', MA.INA J"tJDGE / 2nd December 1994 Both parties absent.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.