Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19941202 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The marriage was irreparably broken due to frequent quarrels and serious allegations, with failed reconciliation efforts; therefore, the decree of divorce is upheld.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • marriage dissolved
  • decision of lower courts upheld

02

Material facts

Parties

Omary Abdallah

Appellant

Mwashamba Omari

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Matrimonial Civil Appeal / Second Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the marriage between the parties should be dissolved due to irreconcilable differences and allegations of witchcraft

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellant challenged the decree of divorce issued by the primary court and upheld by the district court, denying responsibility for the deaths of the children and witchcraft allegations.
Respondent
Respondent alleged that the appellant caused the death of their children by witchcraft, leading to irreconcilable differences and separation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Tanzanian family law

    Marriage may be dissolved if irretrievable breakdown is established and reconciliation efforts fail.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The marriage was irreparably broken due to frequent quarrels and serious allegations, with failed reconciliation efforts; therefore, the decree of divorce is upheld.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • marriage dissolved
  • decision of lower courts upheld

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 2 December 1994

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 2 December 1994

19941202 TZHC Dar es Salaam

IN THE HIGH COUP..T OF TA~ZANIA

AT DAR ES SALAAM PC. MATtlMONIAL CIVIL APPEAL N0.15/88 (From the decision of ~~strict Court of Morogo.ro Dist~ict at Moro€,'oroLCivil Appeal No. 37 of 1988 Original Civil C~se No. 42 of 1988 of Primary Court l'forogoro, OMARY ABDALLl-i.F ~ •• ♦ I. 0. 0 0 o e. 0. ~ •••••.••• AIPELLANT versus MWASHAMBA OI1iillI • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • • • • . . • • RESPONDENT JUDuMENT ..MhIN.A , J •. . 1':1.L1. This is a second appeal bS Omari A~dallah against the decree of divorce issued by the urban primary court, Morogoro. His appeal to the die~rict court was dismi.sse<l. The evic'.ence established tha1· the appellant was married to the respondent, MwashaJJil:)a Omari in 1979 under Islamj_c law, and there were three children to the marriage. Two of the children ci;ied 1 and there were allegations by the respondent that tle appellant caused the death cf the children by witchcraft. These.allega- tions caused misunderstandings betwee~ the parties and frequent quarrels, and finally separa~~on. The allegation.that the appellant ·11as practising witchcraft was supported by Maangaza.Mwu..yimvua who said that the appellant admitted hew~~ uaing instruments of witchcraft; but denied having caused . deaths of his children, This was a case where the parties could not 'be reconciled because of frequent quarrels over petty matters. Efforts to reconcile them failed. In fact the respondent had left

the matrirrionia1. home for go.od •••.. /2 since 1988 because of her belief that the hu~band had ·bewitched the childrun who died. The marriage had irreparably broken <.J·::n and· there was nothing which could be done to sa,re that marriage. I uphold the decision of the l0w0~ courts which dissolved .. the marriage .. The appollant has not raised any matters_ of substance in thJ wemorandum of appealo The appeal -:·., .. ·dismiss.eel. tlA4A.M- w. J', MA.INA J"tJDGE / 2nd December 1994 Both parties absent.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.