64
There was a fatal variance between the charge of attempted rape and the evidence adduced, which proved the offence of rape, not attempted rape. Since the appellant was not charged with rape, the prosecution failed to prove the offence charged, entitling the appellant to acquittal.
- Citation
- 64
- Parties
- Appellant: Omary Mwang’ombe; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless lawfully detained for another matter
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Rape, Rape, Standard of Proof, Variance Between Charge and Evidence, Testimony of Child Witness
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Omary Mwang’ombe
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved the offence of attempted rape beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether there was a fatal variance between the charge and the evidence adduced
- 3 Whether the trial court properly considered the evidence and the defence
Ratio Decidendi
There was a fatal variance between the charge of attempted rape and the evidence adduced, which proved the offence of rape, not attempted rape. Since the appellant was not charged with rape, the prosecution failed to prove the offence charged, entitling the appellant to acquittal.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless lawfully detained for another matter
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment