oscar pendeza vs republic 2018 tzca 366 16 february 2018

oscar pendeza vs republic 2018 tzca 366 16 february 2018

The High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant extension of time for appeal from a decision of a subordinate court exercising extended jurisdiction; only the subordinate court has such power under Section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, rendering the appeal incompetent.

Citation
oscar pendeza vs republic 2018 tzca 366 16 february 2018
Parties
Appellant: Oscar Pendeza; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Preliminary Objection on Competency
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Competency of Appeal
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oscar Pendeza

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Preliminary Objection on Competency

  1. 1 Which court has jurisdiction to grant extension of time to appeal from a decision of a subordinate court exercising extended jurisdiction?
  2. 2 Whether Rule 47 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 or Section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act is the enabling provision for extension of time in such matters.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant extension of time for appeal from a decision of a subordinate court exercising extended jurisdiction; only the subordinate court has such power under Section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, rendering the appeal incompetent.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out.
  • The appellant may file a fresh application for extension of time in the subordinate court.