Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

20130308 TZCA Mwanza

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant, being a prisoner, did all that was reasonably possible to file his notice of appeal, and the absence of an affidavit from the prison superintendent does not defeat his application for extension of time.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant to file notice of appeal to the High Court within thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
  • Memorandum of appeal to be filed within twenty one (21) days from the date of filing the notice of appeal.

02

Material facts

Parties

Otieno Obute

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Victor Karumuna

Amounts and remedies

  • Time to File Notice of Appeal: 30
  • Time to File Memorandum of Appeal After Notice: 21

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to file notice and memorandum of appeal out of time

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submitted his notice of intention to appeal to prison authorities promptly upon admission and complied with section 263 of the Criminal Procedure Act; as a prisoner, he could do no more.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the applicant's claims were unsupported by an affidavit from the prison superintendent and should be disregarded; the delay was of the applicant's own making.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's reasoning in this ruling

    Failure to secure an affidavit from the prison superintendent is not fatal to an application for extension of time by a prisoner if circumstances show the applicant did all within his means.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant, being a prisoner, did all that was reasonably possible to file his notice of appeal, and the absence of an affidavit from the prison superintendent does not defeat his application for extension of time.

Obiter and limits

  • As a prisoner, his rights and responsibilities are restricted.

Court disposition

application granted

  • Applicant to file notice of appeal to the High Court within thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
  • Memorandum of appeal to be filed within twenty one (21) days from the date of filing the notice of appeal.

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 8 March 2013

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 8 March 2013

20130308 TZCA Mwanza

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA

ATMWANZA MZA. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2011 OTIENO OBUTE ................................................................... APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC .................................. 1 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to file notice and petition of appeal out of time from the order of the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza) (Nyanqarika, J.) dated the 6 th day of September, 2010 in Misc. Criminal Application No. 37 of 2010

RULING 8 & 8 March, 2013 BWANA, l.A.: When this application came up for hearing, Mr. Victor Karumuna, learned State Attorney for the respondent Republic, abandoned the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed earlier. We were left, therefore, with the substantive application wherein the applicant, Otieno Obute, seeks leave of this Court to file both his notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal to the High Court, out of time. According to the applicant, he gave to the prison authorities at Musoma, his notice of intention to appeal on the very day he was admitted into· prison. That was on the 3 January 2008. On the following day the same was reduced in writing and he signed it by thumb print on 6 January 2008. Then the documents were duly handed over to the said prison authorities for onward transmission to the High Court Registry at Mwanza, thus complying with the provisions of section 263 of the Criminal . Procedure Act. Being a prisoner, he could not do much thereafter, he avers. Mr. Karumuna's main point of contention is that since the applicant's averments are not supported by an affidavit by the prison superintendent, they should be disregarded by this Court. The delay is of his own making and the application be dismissed. I have considered the averments by both parties and come to the conclusion that this application has merit, the flaws raised by Mr. Karumuna,

notwithstanding. As a prisoner, his rights and responsibilities are restricted. Therefore he did what he could do. 2 He may have been let down by reasons beyond his means. Failure to ! secure the prison superintendent's affidavit is therefore, not fatal to this application, given the circumstances described hereinabqve. Accordingly, the application is granted. The applicant, Otieno Obute, is given further time to file I his notice of appeal to the High Court. The same be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this Ruling. That should be followed by filing of the I memorandum of appeal within twenty one (21) days from the date of I filing the notice of appeal. It is so ordered. DATED at MWANZA this 8th day of March, 2013. S. J. BWANA

JUSTICE OF APPEAL !_certify that this is a true copy of the original. --p- . . --Pr---. ' I I \.) ?· ;_~:MPIKYA

SENIOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR ' ..( ' '·· ---.., . COURT OF APPEAL _d, '-·· ~--•· . .,, ----~-· , ' 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 263 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.