20130308 TZCA Mwanza
- Citation
- 20130308 TZCA Mwanza
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 8 March 2013
- Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 8 March 2013
- Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant, being a prisoner, did all that was reasonably possible to file his notice of appeal, and the absence of an affidavit from the prison superintendent does not defeat his application for extension of time.
Court disposition
application granted
Orders
- Applicant to file notice of appeal to the High Court within thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
- Memorandum of appeal to be filed within twenty one (21) days from the date of filing the notice of appeal.
02
Material facts
Parties
Otieno Obute
ApplicantThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Victor KarumunaAmounts and remedies
- Time to File Notice of Appeal: 30
- Time to File Memorandum of Appeal After Notice: 21
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to file notice and memorandum of appeal out of time
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant submitted his notice of intention to appeal to prison authorities promptly upon admission and complied with section 263 of the Criminal Procedure Act; as a prisoner, he could do no more.
- Respondent
- The respondent argued that the applicant's claims were unsupported by an affidavit from the prison superintendent and should be disregarded; the delay was of the applicant's own making.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's reasoning in this ruling
Failure to secure an affidavit from the prison superintendent is not fatal to an application for extension of time by a prisoner if circumstances show the applicant did all within his means.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant, being a prisoner, did all that was reasonably possible to file his notice of appeal, and the absence of an affidavit from the prison superintendent does not defeat his application for extension of time.
Obiter and limits
- As a prisoner, his rights and responsibilities are restricted.
Court disposition
application granted
- Applicant to file notice of appeal to the High Court within thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
- Memorandum of appeal to be filed within twenty one (21) days from the date of filing the notice of appeal.
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 8 March 2013
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 8 March 2013
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA
ATMWANZA MZA. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2011 OTIENO OBUTE ................................................................... APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC .................................. 1 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to file notice and petition of appeal out of time from the order of the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza) (Nyanqarika, J.) dated the 6 th day of September, 2010 in Misc. Criminal Application No. 37 of 2010
RULING 8 & 8 March, 2013 BWANA, l.A.: When this application came up for hearing, Mr. Victor Karumuna, learned State Attorney for the respondent Republic, abandoned the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed earlier. We were left, therefore, with the substantive application wherein the applicant, Otieno Obute, seeks leave of this Court to file both his notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal to the High Court, out of time. According to the applicant, he gave to the prison authorities at Musoma, his notice of intention to appeal on the very day he was admitted into· prison. That was on the 3 January 2008. On the following day the same was reduced in writing and he signed it by thumb print on 6 January 2008. Then the documents were duly handed over to the said prison authorities for onward transmission to the High Court Registry at Mwanza, thus complying with the provisions of section 263 of the Criminal . Procedure Act. Being a prisoner, he could not do much thereafter, he avers. Mr. Karumuna's main point of contention is that since the applicant's averments are not supported by an affidavit by the prison superintendent, they should be disregarded by this Court. The delay is of his own making and the application be dismissed. I have considered the averments by both parties and come to the conclusion that this application has merit, the flaws raised by Mr. Karumuna,
notwithstanding. As a prisoner, his rights and responsibilities are restricted. Therefore he did what he could do. 2 He may have been let down by reasons beyond his means. Failure to ! secure the prison superintendent's affidavit is therefore, not fatal to this application, given the circumstances described hereinabqve. Accordingly, the application is granted. The applicant, Otieno Obute, is given further time to file I his notice of appeal to the High Court. The same be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this Ruling. That should be followed by filing of the I memorandum of appeal within twenty one (21) days from the date of I filing the notice of appeal. It is so ordered. DATED at MWANZA this 8th day of March, 2013. S. J. BWANA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL !_certify that this is a true copy of the original. --p- . . --Pr---. ' I I \.) ?· ;_~:MPIKYA
SENIOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR ' ..( ' '·· ---.., . COURT OF APPEAL _d, '-·· ~--•· . .,, ----~-· , ' 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.