Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

Otieno Osole Mangasa Japunda

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant is entitled to bail as the offence charged is bailable, and there is no evidence of risk of absconding, given prior compliance with bail conditions. Bail is granted subject to reasonable conditions to ensure the applicant's availability.

Court disposition

Bail granted subject to conditions

Orders

  • Applicant to register two reliable sureties, each to execute bail bond of TZS 1,000,000.
  • Sureties must be residents of Mara Region with introduction letters from street leaders or employers.
  • Sureties must have NIDA card/number in the introduction letter.
  • Applicant restricted from leaving Mara Region without permit from Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicant to report to Deputy Registrar every first Monday of the month and appear when required.
  • Bail conditions to be supervised by Deputy Registrar of Musoma Sub-Registry.

02

Material facts

Parties

Otieno Osole Mangasa @ Japunda

Applicant Counsel: Paulo Binton Obwana

NPS

Respondent Counsel: Jonas Kivuyo

Amounts and remedies

  • Bail Bond Per Surety: TZS 1,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application After Committal to High Court

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail after committal to the High Court for a bailable offence

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant has been committed to the High Court and is entitled to bail, having previously complied with bail conditions before nolle prosequi was entered. Counsel prayed for lenient bail conditions.
Respondent
Respondent did not object to the bail application, acknowledging the offence is bailable, and requested the court to impose conditions to ensure applicant's availability.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Judiciary of Tanzania Bail Guidelines, item 3.2

    Bail is to be granted for bailable offences unless there is a risk of absconding or other imperative factors.

  2. 02

    Francis Davis Mchacky & Ten Others v. Republic, Misc Criminal Application No. 14 of 2022

    Bail conditions must be reasonable unless the offence is serious, in which case conditions may be stiff.

  3. 03

    Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 [R.E. 2022]

    Law regulating bail under section 148(1), (6), and (7) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 [R.E. 2022].

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant is entitled to bail as the offence charged is bailable, and there is no evidence of risk of absconding, given prior compliance with bail conditions. Bail is granted subject to reasonable conditions to ensure the applicant's availability.

Obiter and limits

  • Failure to fulfil bail conditions will deprive the applicant of liberty.
  • Bail conditions must be supervised by the Deputy Registrar.

Court disposition

Bail granted subject to conditions

  • Applicant to register two reliable sureties, each to execute bail bond of TZS 1,000,000.
  • Sureties must be residents of Mara Region with introduction letters from street leaders or employers.
  • Sureties must have NIDA card/number in the introduction letter.
  • Applicant restricted from leaving Mara Region without permit from Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicant to report to Deputy Registrar every first Monday of the month and appear when required.
  • Bail conditions to be supervised by Deputy Registrar of Musoma Sub-Registry.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 10 September 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 10 September 2020

Otieno Osole Mangasa Japunda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA MUSOMA SUB-REGISTRY

AT MUSOMA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 0000888 OF 2024 REFERENCE NO. 202501102000000888 (Arising from PI No. 20231110000036788 of2023 of the District Court of Musoma) OTIENO OSOLE MANGASA@ JAPUNDA ................ APPLICANT

VERSUS NPS....................... RESPONDENT

RULING 07th 8107th February, 2025 M, L. KOMBA.: The present application was brought with chamber summons accompanied by affidavit of Paulo Binton Obwana, advocate for the applicant. The application followed a cancellation of bail granted to the applicant by the District Court of Rorya (the committing court) in PI Criminal Case No. 20241217000035037 (the PI case). On the last day of the proceedings the committing court committed accused person to this court. During hearing the applicant was represented by Mr. Paulo Binton Obwana while Republic was represented by Mr. Jonas Kivuyo, State Attorneys. Page 1 of 4 Mr. Kivuyo was the first to address this court that he has read the application and affidavit and respondent has no objection on application for bail because the offence charged applicant is bailable. He prayed, if this court grant bail, to issue condition as assurance of applicant availability. Mr. Obwana present that applicant has been committed to High Court and following that committal has right to be under bail bearing in mind that previously before Republic entered nolle proseque in November 2024, applicant was under bail he observed all conditions. He prayed for lenient conditions. I find the offence which constitutes the crime in this application is bailable (Attempt to murder). Am aware of the Judiciary of Tanzania Bail Guidelines issued by Hon, Chief Justice on

10th September 2020, item 3.2 of the Guidelines, the possibility that accused person may abscond bail is one of the imperative factors to be considered in granting bail. Applicant in this application was under bail before nolleprosequeand all the time he observed conditions imposed to that bail as submitted by his counsel and that, entrusted this court to consider the application. It should further be noted that if the offence is bailable, then, bail condition set must be reasonable unless for the serious offence, where the condition must be stiff. Failure to Page 2 of 4 fulfil conditions set, applicant will be deprived of his liberty. See Francis Davis Mchacky & Ten Others V. Republic, Misc Criminal Application No. 14 of 2022. Having that in mind while noting the law regulating bail under section 148 (1), (6) and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 [R. E. 2022], I have moved to grant bail to the applicant. However, in order to be released from custody, the applicant must fulfil the following conditions: 1. Applicant have to register two (2) reliable sureties who are able to execute bail bond amounting to Tanzanian Shillings one Million Only (1,000,000/=) each of them.

2. Both sureties must be residents of Mara Region and must have introduction letter from the leaders of street they reside or employers.

3. Both must have NIDA card/number in the introduction letter.

4. Applicant is restricted to move out of Mara Region unless he obtain permit from Deputy Registrar of the High Court.

5. Accused person to report to Deputy Registrar of the High Court every first Monday of every month and has to appear when needed any day and time. Page 3 of 4 6. Bail conditions listed in this ruling should be supervised by Deputy Registrar of this sub registry. The Bail conditions set out in this Ruling shall be supervised by the Deputy Registrar of this court at Musoma Sub-Registry. It is so ordered. k M. L. KOMBA

JUDGE 07 February, 2025 Ruling delivered in chambers under the seal of this court in the presence of Mr. Jonas Kivuyo for Republic and Applicant was represented by Mr. Obwana. K M. L. KOMBA

JUDGE 07 February, 2025 Page 4 of 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Francis Davis Mchacky & Ten Others v. Republic, Misc Criminal Application No. 14 of 2022

Case cited

Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 [R.E. 2022]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.