19750304 TZHC Mwanza
There was no satisfactory evidence that the respondent undertook to supervise or be responsible for the completion of the bricklaying contract; thus, the claim against the respondent was not sufficiently established.
- Citation
- 19750304 TZHC Mwanza
- Parties
- Appellant: Otto Butunga; Respondent: Alphaxad N. Ke
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 1975
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contract, Liability, Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Otto Butunga
Appellant
Alphaxad N. Ke
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent undertook responsibility for the completion of the bricklaying contract
- 2 Whether the claim against the respondent was sufficiently established
Ratio Decidendi
There was no satisfactory evidence that the respondent undertook to supervise or be responsible for the completion of the bricklaying contract; thus, the claim against the respondent was not sufficiently established.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment