Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

deograsia geofrey mwanri vs pacras athanas masawe 2021 tzhc 9108 18 november 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The marriage has irreparably broken down due to cruelty and prolonged separation, and both parties consent to divorce; therefore, a decree of divorce is granted.

Court disposition

decree of divorce granted

Orders

  • Marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Deograsia Geofrey Mwanri

Petitioner Counsel: Levis Lyimo

Pancras Athanas Masawe

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Matrimonial / Final Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The petitioner argued that the marriage had irreparably broken down due to cruelty, including physical abuse and abusive language, and that the parties had lived separately for 24 years. She sought a declaration of breakdown and a decree of divorce.
Respondent
The respondent did not dispute the breakdown of the marriage and agreed that a decree of divorce should be granted, confirming the parties had lived apart for 24 years.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Joseph Warioba Butiku v. Perucy Muganda Butiku (1987) TLR No. 1

    Where the parties have agreed on sufficient issues of fact and law raised in their pleading, the court may pronounce judgment and order accordingly.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The marriage has irreparably broken down due to cruelty and prolonged separation, and both parties consent to divorce; therefore, a decree of divorce is granted.

Court disposition

decree of divorce granted

  • Marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 18 November 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 18 November 2021

deograsia geofrey mwanri vs pacras athanas masawe 2021 tzhc 9108 18 november 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA TEMEKE HIGH COURT SUB-REGISTRY (ONE STOP JUDICIAL CENTER)

AT TEMEKE MATRIMONIAL CASE NO. 1 OF 2021 DEOGRASIA GEOFREY MWANRI.........................PETITIONER

VERSUS PANCRAS ATHANAS MASAWE............................ RESPONDENT Date of Last Order: 18/11/2021 Date of Judgment: 18/11/2021

CONSENT JUDGMENT N.R. MWASEBA, J. The petitioner has filed this suit against the respondent before this court claiming for a declaration that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent has irreparably broken down, an order to dissolve the said marriage and a decree of divorce to be issued. It is pleaded by the petitioner that they cohabited with the respondent and lived together as husband and wife for 18 years before formalizing the marriage on the 22nd July, 1995 at Ilala District in Dar es Salaam. In their relationship, they were blessed with six issues who passed away at their tender age. During the subsistence of their marriage, they acquired two houses situated at Keko Molem, beds, mattress and utensils but she does not demand any division of the matrimonial property. That, the parties lived a peaceful life until 1997 when problems began cropping up. It is said that their marriage was clouded up with cruelty whereby the petitioner was getting beaten up by the respondent and being called by abusive words such as malaya in the presence of friends and relatives as a result their cohabitation became intolerable. Due to the matrimonial disharmony, the petitioner left the matrimonial home in September, 1997, and the two have had a separate life for the last twenty-four years now. The Conciliation Board at Keko ward failed to reconcile them. In his reply to petition

for divorce, the respondent did not dispute that their marriage has broken down irreparably and that the decree of divorce should be granted. In court, the petitioner was represented by Mr Levis Lyimo learned counsel while the respondent appeared in person. When the matter was called up for mention on 18/11/2021 the counsel for the petitioner notified the court that the respondent has filed his reply and the main issue in this case which is divorce is not disputed. He referred this court to the case of Joseph Warioba Butiku V. Perucy Muganda Butiku, (1987) TLR No. 1 and prays that the court grants divorce as prayed. In his reply, the respondent conceded with the submission by the petitioner and insisted on the fact that their marriage has irreparably broken down. He stated that it is 24 years now since his wife left their matrimonial home. So, he prays that the decree of divorce be granted. I have gone through the pleadings, and the submissions of both sides and realized that there is no dispute that their marriage was clouded up with cruelty especially by beatings in which church elders and the respondent's parents failed to reconcile them. Further, there is no dispute that the parties have separated for 24 years now and the marriage conciliation board at Keko ward has failed to reconcile them. Additionally, there is no dispute that their marriage has broken down irreparably.

In the case of Joseph Warioba Butiku V. Perucy Muganda Butiku (Supra) in which both parties pleaded that their marriage had irreparably broken down and prayed for divorce it was held that: "Where the parties have agreed on sufficient issues o f fact and iaw raised in their pleading, the court may pronounce judgement and order accordingly." That being the legal position and considering that the parties are living apart for 24 years and that the claim for divorce has not been contested, I hereby declare that the marriage has broken down irreparably and proceed to grant the decree of divorce as prayed. No order as to costs. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 18th Day of November, 2021. N.R. MWASEBA

JUDGE 18/ 11/2021 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Joseph Warioba Butiku v. Perucy Muganda Butiku (1987) TLR No. 1

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.