PANGEA MINERALS LTD VS PETROFUEL T

PANGEA MINERALS LTD VS PETROFUEL T

The appeal and cross appeal are incompetent as the appellants failed to exhaust the remedy of applying to set aside the ex parte judgment in the High Court before appealing, as required by Order IX rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code and established case law.

Citation
PANGEA MINERALS LTD VS PETROFUEL T
Parties
Appellant: Pangea Minerals Ltd; 1st Respondent: Petrofuel (T) Limited; 2nd Respondent: Power Roads (T) Limited; 3rd Respondent: Lycopodium Tanzania Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Appeal and cross appeal struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Ex Parte Judgment, Appeal Procedure, Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pangea Minerals Ltd

Appellant

Petrofuel (T) Limited

1st Respondent

Power Roads (T) Limited

2nd Respondent

Lycopodium Tanzania Limited

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether an appeal lies against an ex parte judgment before exhausting the remedy of setting aside the judgment in the trial court
  2. 2 Whether the appeal and cross appeal are competent in light of Order IX rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal and cross appeal are incompetent as the appellants failed to exhaust the remedy of applying to set aside the ex parte judgment in the High Court before appealing, as required by Order IX rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code and established case law.

Court Disposition

Appeal and cross appeal struck out with costs

Orders

  • The appeal and cross appeal are struck out with costs.