choya anatory kasazi vs kashemeza phares kabuye and another 2007 tzhc 1 10 october 2007

choya anatory kasazi vs kashemeza phares kabuye and another 2007 tzhc 1 10 october 2007

The 1st respondent made legally indefensible and inexcusable defamatory statements against the petitioner at campaign rallies, which were widely publicized and likely to injure the petitioner's reputation and adversely affect the election result. Such conduct is contrary to the principles of free and fair elections and justifies voiding the election, regardless of whether the statements fall within the specific grounds of section 129(2) of the National Elections Act, as the constitutional mandate for legality and fairness in elections prevails.

Citation
choya anatory kasazi vs kashemeza phares kabuye and another 2007 tzhc 1 10 october 2007
Parties
Petitioner: Choya Anatory Kasazi; 1st Respondent: Kashemeza Phares Kabuye; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed; election declared void
Legal Topics
Parliamentary Election Challenge, Defamatory Campaign Statements, Electoral Irregularities, Voidance of Election Results
Source Language
English
Election Law Defamation Constitutional Law Parliamentary Election Challenge Defamatory Campaign Statements Electoral Irregularities Voidance of Election Results

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Choya Anatory Kasazi

Petitioner

Kashemeza Phares Kabuye

1st Respondent

The Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 1st respondent or his agents attacked the petitioner's vehicle and obstructed supporters
  2. 2 Whether the 1st respondent made defamatory statements against the petitioner during campaigns
  3. 3 Whether the 1st respondent made false allegations regarding misappropriation of funds and other misconduct

Ratio Decidendi

The 1st respondent made legally indefensible and inexcusable defamatory statements against the petitioner at campaign rallies, which were widely publicized and likely to injure the petitioner's reputation and adversely affect the election result. Such conduct is contrary to the principles of free and fair elections and justifies voiding the election, regardless of whether the statements fall within the specific grounds of section 129(2) of the National Elections Act, as the constitutional mandate for legality and fairness in elections prevails.

Court Disposition

petition allowed; election declared void

Orders

  • The election of Kashemeza Phares Kabuye as Member of Parliament for Biharamulo West Constituency is declared void.
  • Petitioner awarded costs to be taxed.