20000204 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The court found that its review of the evidence was necessitated by a misdirection in the first appellate court, which failed to consider evidence given at trial. This was a point of law the court was bound to consider, and thus no further point of law fit for appeal was raised.
- Citation
- 20000204 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: Patrick A. Ulekamile; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Point of Law, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick A. Ulekamile
Applicant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there exists a point of law fit for consideration by the Court of Appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that its review of the evidence was necessitated by a misdirection in the first appellate court, which failed to consider evidence given at trial. This was a point of law the court was bound to consider, and thus no further point of law fit for appeal was raised.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- application dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment