patrick kitindila vs john yapesa 2008 tzhc 273 28 february 2008
The appellant is liable for the unpaid debt as documentary evidence authorizes the respondent to claim it, and procedural objections regarding absence at the district court are baseless due to lack of regulations.
- Citation
- patrick kitindila vs john yapesa 2008 tzhc 273 28 february 2008
- Parties
- Appellant: Patrick Katindila; Respondent: Johny Apesa
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Loan Agreement, Debt Recovery, Appeals Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Patrick Katindila
Appellant
Johny Apesa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has standing to claim the debt under the loan agreement
- 2 Whether the appellant's absence at the district court hearing invalidates the proceedings
- 3 Whether the appellant is liable for the unpaid debt
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant is liable for the unpaid debt as documentary evidence authorizes the respondent to claim it, and procedural objections regarding absence at the district court are baseless due to lack of regulations.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay Tshs. 420,000 plus 7% court rate interest from 15/10/2002
- Orders issued by the Primary Court are upheld and must be enforced
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment