patrick magologozi mongella vs the board of trustees of the public service social security fund another 2022 tzhcld 943 26 september 2022

The applicant accounted for the delay, acted diligently after each decision, and the delay was justified by procedural requirements and not negligence; thus, sufficient cause for extension of time was established.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: patrick magologozi mongella vs the board of trustees of the public service social security fund another 2022 tzhcld 943 26 september 2022
Parties: Applicant: Patrick Magologozi Mongella; 1st Respondent: The Board of Trustees of the Public Service Social Security Fund; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 26 September 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Appeals, Limitation of Actions
Source Language: english

Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Limitation of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Patrick Magologozi Mongella

Applicant

The Board of Trustees of the Public Service Social Security Fund

1st Respondent

The Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient reasons for extension of time to lodge notice of intention to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Time is extended for the applicant to lodge his notice of appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.