paulo basondole sweya vs asteria chozaile 2008 tzhc 319 26 february 2008

paulo basondole sweya vs asteria chozaile 2008 tzhc 319 26 february 2008

The appellant only had an offer, not a registered right of occupancy, and failed to compensate the respondent as agreed; thus, the land authorities lawfully revoked the offer and the appeal has no merit.

Citation
paulo basondole sweya vs asteria chozaile 2008 tzhc 319 26 february 2008
Parties
Appellant: Paulo Basondole Sweya; Respondent: Asteria Chozaile
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Allocation of Land, Revocation of Land Offer, Compensation for Improvements
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paulo Basondole Sweya

Appellant

Asteria Chozaile

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to vacant possession of Plot 114 Block P Geita
  2. 2 Whether the revocation of the appellant's land offer was lawful

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant only had an offer, not a registered right of occupancy, and failed to compensate the respondent as agreed; thus, the land authorities lawfully revoked the offer and the appeal has no merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.