penuel hild laizer vs tib development bank 3 others 2022 tzhclandd 602 30 june 2022
Applicant demonstrated intention to sue and served statutory notice; facts not disputed; application meets legal requirements for Mareva injunction.
- Citation
- penuel hild laizer vs tib development bank 3 others 2022 tzhclandd 602 30 june 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Penuel Hilda Laiser; 1st Respondent: TIB Development Bank; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General; 3rd Respondent: Melva International Limited; 4th Respondent: FJS African Starch Development Company Limited
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Injunction Application
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Injunction, Mareva Injunction, Statutory Notice to Sue Government
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Penuel Hilda Laiser
Applicant
TIB Development Bank
1st Respondent
The Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Melva International Limited
3rd Respondent
FJS African Starch Development Company Limited
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an injunction restraining disposal of property pending expiry of statutory notice to sue the government
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant demonstrated intention to sue and served statutory notice; facts not disputed; application meets legal requirements for Mareva injunction.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- injunction granted restraining disposal of applicant's property pending expiry of statutory notice
- no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment