pere muganda vs the chief secretary and 2 others 2023 tzhc 23052 30 november 2023
The applicant's judicial review application introduced new substantive prayers not screened during the leave application, contravening rule 8(1)(a) of GN No. 324 of 2014. Only matters and prayers presented and granted at the leave stage may be pursued in the substantive application. The preliminary objection is upheld and the application is struck out.
- Citation
- pere muganda vs the chief secretary and 2 others 2023 tzhc 23052 30 november 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Pere Muganda; 1st Respondent: Chief Secretary; 2nd Respondent: Siha District Council; 3rd Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition, Procedural Compliance, Employment Dismissal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pere Muganda
Applicant
Chief Secretary
1st Respondent
Siha District Council
2nd Respondent
Attorney General
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for judicial review contravened rule 8(1)(a) of GN No. 324 of 2014 by introducing new matters not screened during leave application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's judicial review application introduced new substantive prayers not screened during the leave application, contravening rule 8(1)(a) of GN No. 324 of 2014. Only matters and prayers presented and granted at the leave stage may be pursued in the substantive application. The preliminary objection is upheld and the application is struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- Application struck out for contravening rule 8(1)(a) of GN No. 324 of 2014
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment