peter lutashobya bandio vs attorney general 2022 tzhc 10031 2 june 2022

peter lutashobya bandio vs attorney general 2022 tzhc 10031 2 june 2022

The applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay as he was pursuing a defective application and acted promptly thereafter; therefore, the court exercised its discretion to grant an extension of time.

Citation
peter lutashobya bandio vs attorney general 2022 tzhc 10031 2 june 2022
Parties
Applicant: Peter Lutashobya Bandio; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
2 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Extension of Time Judicial Review Limitation of Actions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Lutashobya Bandio

Applicant

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for leave to apply for judicial review

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay as he was pursuing a defective application and acted promptly thereafter; therefore, the court exercised its discretion to grant an extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant is granted an extension of fourteen (14) days from the date of the ruling to file an application for leave to apply for judicial review.