peter mangati vs republic 2018 tzhcced 23 18 may 2018
The High Court is properly moved under the cited provisions and, there being no facts warranting denial of bail, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to conditions considering the nature of the offences.
- Citation
- peter mangati vs republic 2018 tzhcced 23 18 may 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Mang'ati; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- Application for bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Jurisdiction, Unlawful Possession of Government Trophies, Unlawful Possession of Firearms
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Peter Mang'ati
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail for economic offences
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in this matter
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court is properly moved under the cited provisions and, there being no facts warranting denial of bail, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to conditions considering the nature of the offences.
Court Disposition
Application for bail granted
Orders
- Applicant to execute bail bond of Tshs. 5,000,000
- Applicant to produce two reliable sureties resident in Dodoma Region, each to sign bond of Tshs. 3,000,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment