peter mnyanyi vs patrick mission high school 2022 tzhcld 175 29 march 2022

peter mnyanyi vs patrick mission high school 2022 tzhcld 175 29 march 2022

The application was struck out for being time barred and for failure to cite the proper enabling provisions, rendering it incompetent and depriving the court of jurisdiction.

Citation
peter mnyanyi vs patrick mission high school 2022 tzhcld 175 29 march 2022
Parties
Applicant: Peter Mnyanyi; 1st Respondent: Patrick Mission High School; 2nd Respondent: Board of Directors of Mwakitaponda Investment Company Ltd.
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Revision of CMA Award, Time Bar, Proper Citation of Enabling Provisions
Source Language
English
Labour Law Revision of CMA Award Time Bar Proper Citation of Enabling Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Mnyanyi

Applicant

Patrick Mission High School

1st Respondent

Board of Directors of Mwakitaponda Investment Company Ltd.

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application was properly moved under the cited provisions
  2. 2 Whether the application was filed within the prescribed time limit

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out for being time barred and for failure to cite the proper enabling provisions, rendering it incompetent and depriving the court of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • The applicant's application is struck out for being time barred and improperly before the court.