peter mnyanyi vs patrick mission high school another 2022 tzhcld 1057 3 november 2022
The grounds for review do not disclose an error apparent on the face of the record and require long debate, thus do not meet the requirements for review under Rule 27 (2) (b) and (c) of the Labour Court Rules.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- peter mnyanyi vs patrick mission high school another 2022 tzhcld 1057 3 november 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Mnyanyi; Respondent: Patrick Mission High School; Respondent: Board of Directors of Mwakitaponda Investment Company Limited
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Review / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for lack of merit.
- Legal Topics
- Review of Court Ruling, Error on Face of Record, Time Limitation, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Mnyanyi
Applicant
Patrick Mission High School
Respondent
Board of Directors of Mwakitaponda Investment Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Review / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient grounds exist for review of the ruling in Revision Application No. 486 of 2020
- 2 Whether the application disclosed an error apparent on the face of the record
- 3 Whether the application was time barred
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds for review do not disclose an error apparent on the face of the record and require long debate, thus do not meet the requirements for review under Rule 27 (2) (b) and (c) of the Labour Court Rules.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for lack of merit.
Orders
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment