peter mwendisinga vs asha yusufu 2012 tzhclandd 17 29 march 2012
Appeal dismissed as appellant's grounds lacked merit; respondent's occupation and claim supported by evidence and doctrine of adverse possession; issues not pleaded below cannot be raised on appeal.
- Citation
- peter mwendisinga vs asha yusufu 2012 tzhclandd 17 29 march 2012
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Mwedisinga; Respondent: Asha Yusufu
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Evidence Evaluation, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Peter Mwedisinga
Appellant
Asha Yusufu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 whether respondent proved ownership of disputed land
- 2 whether doctrine of adverse possession applies
- 3 whether appellant established occupation prior to respondent's claim
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal dismissed as appellant's grounds lacked merit; respondent's occupation and claim supported by evidence and doctrine of adverse possession; issues not pleaded below cannot be raised on appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment