peter nghomango vs attorney general 2017 tzca 379 14 december 2017
The application was incompetent due to failure to cite the specific paragraph of Rule 66(1) as required by Rule 48(1), and was therefore struck out.
- Citation
- peter nghomango vs attorney general 2017 tzca 379 14 december 2017
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Ng'homango; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Review / Ruling on Procedural Competence
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Review Applications, Procedural Requirements, Non Citation of Enabling Provisions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Parties
Peter Ng'homango
Applicant
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Review / Ruling on Procedural Competence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for review was properly instituted by citing the correct enabling provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The application was incompetent due to failure to cite the specific paragraph of Rule 66(1) as required by Rule 48(1), and was therefore struck out.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- application struck out with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment