Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

petro marmo gara vs the republic 2023 tzhc 22619 15 november 2023

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Illegality exists on the face of the record regarding the sentence, warranting extension of time to appeal.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Time to lodge notice of appeal extended for ten days from date of ruling
  • Time to lodge petition of appeal extended for twenty days from date of ruling

02

Material facts

Parties

Petro Marmo @ Gara

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Ms. Ester Malima

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence Imposed: 14

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applied for extension of time to lodge notice of appeal and appeal out of time.
Respondent
Did not oppose the application, argued that the sentence imposed was illegal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Tanzanian criminal procedure jurisprudence

    Extension of time may be granted where there is illegality apparent on the record.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Illegality exists on the face of the record regarding the sentence, warranting extension of time to appeal.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Time to lodge notice of appeal extended for ten days from date of ruling
  • Time to lodge petition of appeal extended for twenty days from date of ruling

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 15 November 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 15 November 2023

petro marmo gara vs the republic 2023 tzhc 22619 15 november 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE SUB-REGISTRY OF MANYARA

AT BABATI MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2023 (Arising from Mise. Criminal Application No. 21 of2022 Mbuiu District Court) PETRO MARMO @ GARA................................................ APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC....................................................................RESPONDENT

RULING 15th November & lSh November, 2023 Kahyoza, J. Petro Marmo @ Gara, the appellant was convicted and sentenced to 14 years for the offence of house breaking. He was convicted upon his own plea of guilty. He did not lodge the notice of appeal or lodge an appeal against the sentence which was not barred by law. Later, he applied for extension of time to lodge the notice of appeal and appeal out of time. Ms. Ester Malima State Attorney, did not oppose the application on the ground that there is illegality. She argued that the sentence imposed was illegal. Having heard the submission from the respondent (the Republic) and reviewed the proceedings and the sentence, I agree that, there exists illegality on the face of record. I will not go into detail. Hence, the application 1 has merit and it is hereby granted. Time to lodge notice of appeal is extended for ten (10) days from the date of the ruling. Further, I extend time to lodge the petition of appeal for twenty (20) days from the date of this ruling. It is ordered accordingly. Dated at Babati this 15th davof November, 2023. R. Kahyoza Judge Court: Ruling read over and explained to the applicant and in the presence of Ms. Ester Malima, State Attorney for the Respondent. B/C Fatina (RMA) Present. J. R. Kahyoza Judge 15/11/2023 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.