na TZHC Mwanza 3
The evidence did not prove indecent assault or obstruction beyond reasonable doubt, but did establish that the appellant escaped from lawful custody. The conviction for obstruction was substituted with a conviction for escape under section 116 of the Penal Code.
- Citation
- na TZHC Mwanza 3
- Parties
- Appellant: Petro Miança; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction for obstruction quashed and substituted with conviction for escape from lawful custody under section 116 of the Penal Code.
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Obstructing a Police Officer, Escape From Lawful Custody
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petro Miança
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant committed indecent assault
- 2 Whether the appellant obstructed a police officer or escaped from lawful custody
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not prove indecent assault or obstruction beyond reasonable doubt, but did establish that the appellant escaped from lawful custody. The conviction for obstruction was substituted with a conviction for escape under section 116 of the Penal Code.
Court Disposition
Conviction for obstruction quashed and substituted with conviction for escape from lawful custody under section 116 of the Penal Code.
Orders
- Conviction under section 243(b) quashed
- Conviction for escape under section 116 of the Penal Code substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment