20031028 TZHC Arusha

The appellant cannot be heard to complain about the jurisdictional issue as it was not properly raised as a specific point of objection, and the second ground of appeal is vague and lacks clarity.

Citation: 20031028 TZHC Arusha
Parties: Appellant: Philip Tarimo; Respondent: Samwel Sumary
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 28 October 2003
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objection, Interim Injunction, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Preliminary Objection Interim Injunction Stay of Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Philip Tarimo

Appellant

Samwel Sumary

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Resident Magistrate's Court had jurisdiction over Civil Case No. 24 of 2000
2 Whether the trial court erred in disregarding the preliminary objection regarding jurisdiction
3 Whether the trial court was biased in disregarding the application for stay of proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant cannot be heard to complain about the jurisdictional issue as it was not properly raised as a specific point of objection, and the second ground of appeal is vague and lacks clarity.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

Appeal dismissed with costs.