pimak profesyonel mutfak ltd sirket vs pimak t ltd another 2018 tzhccomd 37 9 february 2018

pimak profesyonel mutfak ltd sirket vs pimak t ltd another 2018 tzhccomd 37 9 february 2018

No security for costs was furnished within the stipulated time; the reason advanced was insufficient; the suit must be dismissed as per Order XXV Rule 2(1) of CPC.

Citation
pimak profesyonel mutfak ltd sirket vs pimak t ltd another 2018 tzhccomd 37 9 february 2018
Parties
Plaintiff: PIMAK PROFESYONEL MUTFAK LIMITED SIRKETI; 1st Defendant: PIMAK TANZANIA LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: FARHIA ABDULAH NOOR
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
9 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Oral Application for Extension of Time to Furnish Security for Costs
Outcome
suit dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Extension of Time, Dismissal of Suit
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Security for Costs Extension of Time Dismissal of Suit

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PIMAK PROFESYONEL MUTFAK LIMITED SIRKETI

Plaintiff

PIMAK TANZANIA LIMITED

1st Defendant

FARHIA ABDULAH NOOR

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Oral Application for Extension of Time to Furnish Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted an extension of time to furnish security for costs

Ratio Decidendi

No security for costs was furnished within the stipulated time; the reason advanced was insufficient; the suit must be dismissed as per Order XXV Rule 2(1) of CPC.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Suit dismissed with costs as no security for costs was furnished within the time fixed by the court.