NA TZHC Dar es Salaam 2
There was no evidence that respondents destroyed appellant's crops; the dispute over land ownership must be resolved in a civil suit before any criminal liability can be determined.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- NA TZHC Dar es Salaam 2
- Parties
- Appellant: Pius Albert; Respondent: Paulo Mjanda; Respondent: Patrice Mjanda; Respondent: Rashid Mjanda
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Damage to Property, Land Ownership Dispute, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pius Albert
Appellant
Paulo Mjanda
Respondent
Patrice Mjanda
Respondent
Rashid Mjanda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents unlawfully and maliciously destroyed appellant's crops
- 2 Whether appellant owns the disputed land
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence that respondents destroyed appellant's crops; the dispute over land ownership must be resolved in a civil suit before any criminal liability can be determined.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Respondents acquitted
- Appellant directed to institute civil suit for land ownership determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment