exim bank t ltd vs jengela trading company 2 others 2004 tzhccomd 26 7 june 2004
Judgment was entered for the plaintiff on admission because the Managing Director of the defendant, who is also the second defendant, admitted the claim, making further evidence unnecessary.
- Citation
- exim bank t ltd vs jengela trading company 2 others 2004 tzhccomd 26 7 june 2004
- Parties
- Defendant: Jengela Trading Company Ltd; Defendant: Anyelwisye M. Jengela; Defendant: Yeriko A. Jengela; Plaintiff: Plaintiff
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Judgment on Admission
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff on admission
- Legal Topics
- Judgment on Admission, Evidence, Admission of Claim
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jengela Trading Company Ltd
Defendant
Anyelwisye M. Jengela
Defendant
Yeriko A. Jengela
Defendant
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Judgment on Admission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment should be entered on admission by the defendant
- 2 Whether further evidence from defendant's witnesses is necessary after admission
Ratio Decidendi
Judgment was entered for the plaintiff on admission because the Managing Director of the defendant, who is also the second defendant, admitted the claim, making further evidence unnecessary.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff on admission
Orders
- Judgment entered for plaintiff under Order XII rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Code 1966
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment