polycarp razaro vs rashid kavikuta and another 2021 tzhclandd 501 24 september 2021

polycarp razaro vs rashid kavikuta and another 2021 tzhclandd 501 24 september 2021

The applicant failed to file the application within the prescribed 21 days as ordered by the court, and did not provide sufficient proof or justification for the delay. The application was therefore time barred and incompetent.

Citation
polycarp razaro vs rashid kavikuta and another 2021 tzhclandd 501 24 september 2021
Parties
Applicant: Polycarp Lazaro; 1st Respondent: Rashid Kavikuta; 2nd Respondent: Rhino Auction Mart
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 September 2021
Procedural Posture
Land Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Limitation Period, Revision Proceedings, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Limitation Period Revision Proceedings Preliminary Objection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Polycarp Lazaro

Applicant

Rashid Kavikuta

1st Respondent

Rhino Auction Mart

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for revision was time barred and thus incompetent

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to file the application within the prescribed 21 days as ordered by the court, and did not provide sufficient proof or justification for the delay. The application was therefore time barred and incompetent.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Preliminary objection sustained
  • Application dismissed with costs