quality group ltd vs nmb bank ltd 2023 tzhccomd 77 16 march 2023
The applicant failed to demonstrate that the alleged illegality was apparent on the face of the record, as determining the legality of the statutory notice of default would require a long-drawn-out process of examining evidence and court records, which is not permissible for extension of time based on illegality. The applicant also failed to show diligence and account for the delay.
- Citation
- quality group ltd vs nmb bank ltd 2023 tzhccomd 77 16 march 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Quality Group Limited; Respondent: NMB Bank PLC
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Default, Appeals, Illegality as Ground for Extension
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Quality Group Limited
Applicant
NMB Bank PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file a notice of appeal out of time
- 2 Whether alleged illegality in the judgment of Commercial Case No. 84 of 2018 is apparent on the record and justifies extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate that the alleged illegality was apparent on the face of the record, as determining the legality of the statutory notice of default would require a long-drawn-out process of examining evidence and court records, which is not permissible for extension of time based on illegality. The applicant also failed to show diligence and account for the delay.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for extension of time is refused for lacking merit.
- Respondent awarded costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment