queen jonathan gao vs nmb plc 2020 tzhcld 185 8 june 2020

queen jonathan gao vs nmb plc 2020 tzhcld 185 8 june 2020

The application for extension of time to file revision cannot be granted because the applicant has not first applied to set aside the ex parte order. The proper procedure is to set aside the ex parte order before seeking further remedies.

Citation
queen jonathan gao vs nmb plc 2020 tzhcld 185 8 june 2020
Parties
Applicant: Queen Jonathan Gao; Respondent: N.M.B PLC
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Ex Parte Orders, Execution of Judgments, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Ex Parte Orders Execution of Judgments Right to Be Heard

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Queen Jonathan Gao

Applicant

N.M.B PLC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision against the ex parte order dated 13th August 2018
  2. 2 Whether illegality of the registrar's order constitutes good cause for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time to file revision cannot be granted because the applicant has not first applied to set aside the ex parte order. The proper procedure is to set aside the ex parte order before seeking further remedies.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to file revision is struck out.