raha ltd vs steven rwelamila 2 other 2022 tzhcld 971 11 october 2022
CMA had no jurisdiction to determine the dispute as it was filed out of time and leave to file a fresh referral was granted without affording parties the right to be heard or a formal application for condonation.
- Citation
- raha ltd vs steven rwelamila 2 other 2022 tzhcld 971 11 october 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Raha Limited; 1st Respondent: Steven Rwelamila; 2nd Respondent: Shemsa Selemani; 3rd Respondent: Khalid Mkombwa
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Revision Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- CMA proceedings nullified, award quashed and set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Retrenchment, Unfair Termination, Jurisdiction, Limitation of Time, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raha Limited
Applicant
Steven Rwelamila
1st Respondent
Shemsa Selemani
2nd Respondent
Khalid Mkombwa
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Revision Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commission for Mediation and Arbitration (CMA) had jurisdiction to determine the dispute given the limitation of time
- 2 Whether the arbitrator erred in granting leave to file a fresh referral without affording parties the right to be heard
- 3 Whether the award for compensation and damages was justified
Ratio Decidendi
CMA had no jurisdiction to determine the dispute as it was filed out of time and leave to file a fresh referral was granted without affording parties the right to be heard or a formal application for condonation.
Court Disposition
CMA proceedings nullified, award quashed and set aside.
Orders
- CMA proceedings are nullified.
- Award arising from CMA is quashed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment