20110406 TZHC Dodoma

" . __._f,; ./ -/. ·:- _,··_ Il\fTHE HIG_H.CO.URT·Of TANZANIA • •.-• '"' •,· • • •• • > , . :, •,•• • • .• • , .• C .•• .: : (LAND DIV~S.ION) ·_ . ·AT·:DODOMA . .·.·-:M1sC-EtLANE;ous·lA~·-o:cAsE·APL1tAT10N No. -1g oF 201i .· ...·. , .. ~·. ··: ., . ··~ ·:' '.~·::;~'-)/·~....?;~~'.· ·'\~'::· ·::•~.'·/·.-·::~ ..:·.·.__.·_. : .· ._ ·' ·' · . ·::'.·. · .. ·... ·.·....· .·· ... ·. ·; . . . ;. • ~ < ·.Q :. '::_· ·: =-~ ~ ··.:·.' .'. ·. ~:. :· ,, .• .:, .•... ····:--:::·-.. ·:.: . .. .··, .. : : RAHIM FIDAHV~SEIN JAN MOHAMED . .(Sui_ng ln his··cap~tity· . as a-Holder of Power of Attorney . . of :·. . . FAR.IDA FAZ.AL N_AS$E~ .BHAi..OQ) ..:......... ~~ ...... APPLICANT • 0 ~ • • 0 • • .- ,- 0 .- •. •. • •• 0 : 0 • C O • 0 • •• •." 0 0 0 ·• • • · versus · CAPITAL DEVELO_MENT AUTHORITY - AN_D ANOTHER ... -•. ~~.~-.~ ....... ~~ ...·............... RESPON.DENTS RULING- EX-PARTE.ORDER. . . . . : . . . . . HON~.MADAM, SHANGALL]. ·. ·,. .. \The .. a'pplitant . . . . ~nf~·:;:-1QAHUSSEIN ·~. . .. . .- JANMOHAMED (suing . . . . . . in ..his_ ~apacity · · as a holder of p~0er ··. -: :· .... ·-. '.. . ~f.Attorney of (FARID A FAZAl . •' I\IAS~ER_ Bt-lA~(J()} being represented by Mpoki _& Associates . ,-· .•· . ·.·.· .. .. . . . Advocat~ ·of Dar es Salaam has filed this application. under certificate of urgency seeking fqr an e~partt= _acl-.interim order of injunction to -restrain .. the . -fi~st · respon·d~_,;~, / _::CAP]:TAL -_ DEVELOPMENT· AUTHORITY .- (CPA), its servants,. ·, . agents or any other person from . '· . . evicting FARIDA, FAZAL · NASSER BHALo·o· from apartment No. 4/0-001; which is part of . .- .· . a house situated on Plot No. 4, Block "O" . . ·~ . \ 2 ,. Hatibu . area,· Dodoma · Municipality, per,ding · the hearing and i determinati~n~·bf the: hlai'n appiic~tion enter-partes. The application has been made under Order XXXVII, Rule 1 (a) sand ·(b}. and ·section_. 95 of the Civil . . .. Procedure Code, 1966 (Cap. 33 . ~ . . . . R.E. 2002). The. chamber . summons thereof . is du.ly supported by the·· · affidavit deponed by the applicant Mr. RAHIM FIDAHUSSEtN JAN MOHAMED. In the heari~g of \he appl.ic:ation.. Mr. ·oaimu, · learned ad~ocate ~ •, '. . . . . . ' . . . . from Mpoki & Associate Advocates~ ·who appeared for the applicant re-interated the facts deponed in the affidavit and submitted to the effect that Farida Fazal Nasser Bhaloo is the lawful licensee tenant occupying apartment No .. _4/~:..001 whi~h came under the ownership of the Capital Development Authority following nationalization exercise and acquisition of . buildings Act, 1971. That, the first respondent, without la'-".Vful cause has been attempting to terminated the lease. agreem.er:1t .and evictir:ig,- the_ applicant while claiming for 0 • I•' unjus_tified rent arrea·rs from the applicant: Mr. DaimLJ submitted that consequen~e to the first respondents . . . . demand and harassment the applicant decided to refer the matter before the court by filing a Land Case No. 1_ of 2011 against the first respondent. That case is now pending before this court. ( 3 He further submitted_ that, while the said case is pending in court· the first responde_nt has issued a 14 days demand notice against the applicant directing him to pay the purported arrears to the tune of TShs.15,616,100 or to suffer eviction from the suit premises on expir_ery of 14 days. Mr. Daimu submitted that the said notice (copy) attached to the affidavit as Annex I was issued through the second respondent on 19.03._2011. Mr. Daimu submitteo that, in fear of the repercussions on . . alleged eviction, the applicant· decided to file this application under certificate of urgency seeking for inter-alia, an ex-parte interim order of injunction to refrain the first respondent, its servants, and agents from evicting hjm pending· full hearing and determination of the main application enter-partes. The learned advo"cate argued that if the exparte interim order is not granted the main application· and indeed the pending land case will be rendered nugato·ry ·because the respondent is_ bent to evict the applicant. As a result, contended Mr. Dai mu, the. applicant will suffer · irreparable loss because she have no alternative accommodation. Having gone through the applicant' s affidavit and having heard Mr. Daimu's submission, I am satisfied that in the interest of. justice the situation and circumstances of this matter requires an urgent restraint order against the first respondent from evicting the -4 partes. .: ·,,:. '. ' . . · .. The appl_i'~ation· for· exparte int~rim o·rder of injunction a_gainst the respondents··is . ·. . . . "hereby/ -~iranted~·:,. : -·The . . . ·.· first respondent, pr its . . serva'nts, agen.ts:. or_ any. other'. person on its. b'ehalf is hereby. restrained from evicting: the applicant . Farida Fazal Nasser Bhaloo from the suit premises. pending the hearing and determination of this . It is so ordered: ' . M.S. S JUDG 06/04/201_1 _.· :·:Ru:ling d~Uvere~/to8ate.6~h: Ap,rH/2011 .in.the presenc·e. Of Mr'..· Daimu, learned advocate for the applicant and applicant in person. M.S. SH ........,. -JUDGE. 06/04/2011 :·. : .·•·:. ,•