rajabu hassani mfaume and others vs republic 2020 tzhc 4031 30 november 2020
Since the offences are bailable and the prosecution did not oppose, the applicants are entitled to bail as a constitutional right.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- rajabu hassani mfaume and others vs republic 2020 tzhc 4031 30 november 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Rajabu Hassani Mfaume; Applicant: Hamis Abdallah Seif Mlege; Applicant: Dadi Hassan Shamte Shayo; Applicant: Moshi Hamisi Mbelenje; Applicant: Fatuma Raphael Protas; Applicant: Fatuma Ibrahimu Kumwali; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Right to Liberty, Bailable Offences
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajabu Hassani Mfaume
Applicant
Hamis Abdallah Seif Mlege
Applicant
Dadi Hassan Shamte Shayo
Applicant
Moshi Hamisi Mbelenje
Applicant
Fatuma Raphael Protas
Applicant
Fatuma Ibrahimu Kumwali
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial
Ratio Decidendi
Since the offences are bailable and the prosecution did not oppose, the applicants are entitled to bail as a constitutional right.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000 with one reliable surety in the same amount.
- Sureties must exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property within Lindi Region.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment