rajabu hassani mfaume and others vs republic 2020 tzhc 4031 30 november 2020
- Citation
- rajabu hassani mfaume and others vs republic 2020 tzhc 4031 30 november 2020
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 30 November 2020
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 30 November 2020
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Since the offences are bailable and the prosecution did not oppose, the applicants are entitled to bail as a constitutional right.
Court disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000 with one reliable surety in the same amount.
- Sureties must exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property within Lindi Region.
- Sureties to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
- Applicants to surrender any travel documents to the OCD, Lindi District.
- Applicants shall not travel outside the jurisdiction of Lindi Resident Magistrate's Court without written permission of the Resident Magistrate in charge of Lindi region.
- Applicants to appear before the Resident Magistrates Court at Lindi as directed.
02
Material facts
Parties
Rajabu Hassani Mfaume
Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin MziliwiHamis Abdallah Seif Mlege
Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin MziliwiDadi Hassan Shamte Shayo
Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin MziliwiMoshi Hamisi Mbelenje
Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin MziliwiFatuma Raphael Protas
Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin MziliwiFatuma Ibrahimu Kumwali
Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin MziliwiThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Paul KimweriAmounts and remedies
- Bail Bond Per Applicant: TZS 20,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants, through counsel, argued for release on bail, asserting their constitutional right and that the offences are bailable.
- Respondent
- Respondent, through Senior State Attorney, did not object to the grant of bail.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Constitution of Tanzania and general criminal procedure
Bail is a constitutional right for accused persons unless offences are non-bailable.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Since the offences are bailable and the prosecution did not oppose, the applicants are entitled to bail as a constitutional right.
Court disposition
Application granted
- Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000 with one reliable surety in the same amount.
- Sureties must exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property within Lindi Region.
- Sureties to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
- Applicants to surrender any travel documents to the OCD, Lindi District.
- Applicants shall not travel outside the jurisdiction of Lindi Resident Magistrate's Court without written permission of the Resident Magistrate in charge of Lindi region.
- Applicants to appear before the Resident Magistrates Court at Lindi as directed.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 30 November 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 30 November 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
AT MTWARA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2020 {Originating from the Resident Magistrate Court of Lindi in Economic case No. 7 of2020) RAJABU HASSANI MFAUME.............................. 1st APPLICANT HAMIS ABDALLAH SEIF MLEGE....................... 2nd APPLICANT DADI HASSAN SHAMTE SHAYO......................... 3rd APPLICANT MOSHI HAMISI MBELENJE................................ 4th APPLICANT FATUMA RAPHAEL PROTAS............................... 5th APPLICANT FATUMA IBRAHIMU KUMWALI......................... 6th APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC....................................................... RESPONDENT
RULING The present applicants are craving for being released on bail. They ire charged with an offence of seven counts at the Court of resident Magistrate Lindi. i This application has been supported by an affidavit sworn by Mr. Jeston Justin Mziliwi, learned advocate for the applicants. The record is clear that the application has not been resisted by way of a counter affidavit or otherwise. At the hearing of this application, Mr. Jeston Justin, learned counsel represented the applicants where as Mr. Paul Kimweri, learned Senior State Attorney appeared for the respondent. Mr. Jeston Justin argued in support of the application. On part of the respondent, Mr. Paul Kimweri had no objection to the grant of this filed bailed application. I have considered the chamber summons and the supporting affidavit. I have also taken into account the submission of learned advocate for the applicants and the fact that this application has not been resisted. In view of the fact that bail is the accused person's constitutional right and the fact that the offences the applicants stand charged with are bailable, I grant the application and admit the applicants to bail on the following bail conditions:- 1. Each applicant/accused to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000/= each with one reliable surety in the same amount.
2. The sureties to exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property situated within Lindi Region. 2 3. The sureties to be approved by the Deputy registrar.
4. The applicants/accused to surrender any travel documents, if any, to the OCD, Lindi District.
5. The applicants/accused shall not travel outside the local jurisdiction of Lindi Resident Magistrate's court without the written permission of the Resident Magistrate in charge of Lindi region.
6. The applicants/accused persons shall appear before the Resident Magistrates Court at Lindi on the dates and at the times as shall be directed by the Resident Magistrate's Court, Lindi. Order accordingly. W. P. DYANSOBERA
JUDGE 30.11.2020 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.