Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

rajabu hassani mfaume and others vs republic 2020 tzhc 4031 30 november 2020

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Since the offences are bailable and the prosecution did not oppose, the applicants are entitled to bail as a constitutional right.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000 with one reliable surety in the same amount.
  • Sureties must exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property within Lindi Region.
  • Sureties to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicants to surrender any travel documents to the OCD, Lindi District.
  • Applicants shall not travel outside the jurisdiction of Lindi Resident Magistrate's Court without written permission of the Resident Magistrate in charge of Lindi region.
  • Applicants to appear before the Resident Magistrates Court at Lindi as directed.

02

Material facts

Parties

Rajabu Hassani Mfaume

Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin Mziliwi

Hamis Abdallah Seif Mlege

Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin Mziliwi

Dadi Hassan Shamte Shayo

Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin Mziliwi

Moshi Hamisi Mbelenje

Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin Mziliwi

Fatuma Raphael Protas

Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin Mziliwi

Fatuma Ibrahimu Kumwali

Applicant Counsel: Jeston Justin Mziliwi

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Paul Kimweri

Amounts and remedies

  • Bail Bond Per Applicant: TZS 20,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants, through counsel, argued for release on bail, asserting their constitutional right and that the offences are bailable.
Respondent
Respondent, through Senior State Attorney, did not object to the grant of bail.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Constitution of Tanzania and general criminal procedure

    Bail is a constitutional right for accused persons unless offences are non-bailable.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Since the offences are bailable and the prosecution did not oppose, the applicants are entitled to bail as a constitutional right.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000 with one reliable surety in the same amount.
  • Sureties must exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property within Lindi Region.
  • Sureties to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicants to surrender any travel documents to the OCD, Lindi District.
  • Applicants shall not travel outside the jurisdiction of Lindi Resident Magistrate's Court without written permission of the Resident Magistrate in charge of Lindi region.
  • Applicants to appear before the Resident Magistrates Court at Lindi as directed.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 30 November 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 30 November 2020

rajabu hassani mfaume and others vs republic 2020 tzhc 4031 30 november 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA

AT MTWARA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2020 {Originating from the Resident Magistrate Court of Lindi in Economic case No. 7 of2020) RAJABU HASSANI MFAUME.............................. 1st APPLICANT HAMIS ABDALLAH SEIF MLEGE....................... 2nd APPLICANT DADI HASSAN SHAMTE SHAYO......................... 3rd APPLICANT MOSHI HAMISI MBELENJE................................ 4th APPLICANT FATUMA RAPHAEL PROTAS............................... 5th APPLICANT FATUMA IBRAHIMU KUMWALI......................... 6th APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC....................................................... RESPONDENT

RULING The present applicants are craving for being released on bail. They ire charged with an offence of seven counts at the Court of resident Magistrate Lindi. i This application has been supported by an affidavit sworn by Mr. Jeston Justin Mziliwi, learned advocate for the applicants. The record is clear that the application has not been resisted by way of a counter affidavit or otherwise. At the hearing of this application, Mr. Jeston Justin, learned counsel represented the applicants where as Mr. Paul Kimweri, learned Senior State Attorney appeared for the respondent. Mr. Jeston Justin argued in support of the application. On part of the respondent, Mr. Paul Kimweri had no objection to the grant of this filed bailed application. I have considered the chamber summons and the supporting affidavit. I have also taken into account the submission of learned advocate for the applicants and the fact that this application has not been resisted. In view of the fact that bail is the accused person's constitutional right and the fact that the offences the applicants stand charged with are bailable, I grant the application and admit the applicants to bail on the following bail conditions:- 1. Each applicant/accused to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 20,000,000/= each with one reliable surety in the same amount.

2. The sureties to exhibit evidence of possession of immovable property situated within Lindi Region. 2 3. The sureties to be approved by the Deputy registrar.

4. The applicants/accused to surrender any travel documents, if any, to the OCD, Lindi District.

5. The applicants/accused shall not travel outside the local jurisdiction of Lindi Resident Magistrate's court without the written permission of the Resident Magistrate in charge of Lindi region.

6. The applicants/accused persons shall appear before the Resident Magistrates Court at Lindi on the dates and at the times as shall be directed by the Resident Magistrate's Court, Lindi. Order accordingly. W. P. DYANSOBERA

JUDGE 30.11.2020 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.