rajabu ngwanda 3 others vs republic 2013 tzca 383 6 august 2013
The appeal is incompetent because the appellants failed to obtain a certificate from the High Court on a point of law, which is a mandatory requirement for appeals from criminal matters originating in Primary Courts.
- Citation
- rajabu ngwanda 3 others vs republic 2013 tzca 383 6 august 2013
- Parties
- Appellant: Rajabu Ngwanda; Appellant: Godfrey Frank; Appellant: Martin Kimemile; Appellant: Mustapha Manzi; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Ruling on Competence of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Armed Robbery, Appeals From Primary Court, Certificate on Point of Law, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajabu Ngwanda
Appellant
Godfrey Frank
Appellant
Martin Kimemile
Appellant
Mustapha Manzi
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Ruling on Competence of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal to the Court of Appeal is competent without a certificate from the High Court on a point of law in a criminal matter originating from the Primary Court
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is incompetent because the appellants failed to obtain a certificate from the High Court on a point of law, which is a mandatory requirement for appeals from criminal matters originating in Primary Courts.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The appeal is struck out.
- The appellants may apply in the High Court for extension of time and for a certificate on point of law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment