Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

19710517 TZCA Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The evidence against the appellant was overwhelming and conclusive, and the identification of stolen articles and ownership was properly established. There was no merit in the appeal.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed in its entirety

02

Material facts

Parties

Ram Juma

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellant challenged the conviction for breaking into a building and stealing.
Respondent
Respondent maintained that the evidence was overwhelming and conclusive as to the appellant's guilt.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Trial court judgment and appellate review

    Conviction must be based on overwhelming and conclusive evidence, including proper identification of stolen articles and ownership.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The evidence against the appellant was overwhelming and conclusive, and the identification of stolen articles and ownership was properly established. There was no merit in the appeal.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed

  • Appeal dismissed in its entirety

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 17 May 1971

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 17 May 1971

19710517 TZCA Dar es Salaam

IN TK. HIOB CQI7RT OP TANZANIA AT DAR 313 SALAA Criminal Appeal No. 136 of 1971 (Original Criminal Case No. 234 of 1970 of the District Court of Morogoro District at Morogoro Bcforo ?J.O. Bbayo, lsq., Resident fagistrate) RAA?1 JUMA •s•ss••.e.ó••.•.•....•...*..a APP2Lii&T vereno TBE RBPJBLIC •...,..,........,...,,,.,,.... R8PODEWT OflARGE: Breaking into a building and stealing c/a 296(1) of the Peai Coda, Cap.16 of the Laws. JtTDOM PATEL AG. J. - Appellant is convicted of hreakin into a building and stealing from therein. The e'vHence is overshelming and conoluaive as to appellant's guilt. The learned, trial magistrate has gone thoroughly into the question of identification of articles tOlen and ownership was also etalished to his complete satisfaction. I.agree with his finding and see no reason to interfere. I certify there is no merit in the appeal and dismiss it in its eatiri'ty. (.n. PAT:L) AG. 3UI0 Dar es SalaW 9 17th May, 1971.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code Cap.16 section 296(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.