ramadhani mrema vs victoria saduka 2020 tzhclandd 3982 20 november 2020

ramadhani mrema vs victoria saduka 2020 tzhclandd 3982 20 november 2020

The applicant failed to justify the inordinate delay of more than three years; alleged misplacement of court file was unsupported; issues raised did not amount to illegality apparent on the face of the record; application dismissed for lack of merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
ramadhani mrema vs victoria saduka 2020 tzhclandd 3982 20 november 2020
Parties
Applicant: Ramadhani Mrema; Respondent: Victoria Saduka
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Illegality, Locus Standi, Assessors' Opinions
Source Language
english
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Illegality Locus Standi Assessors' Opinions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramadhani Mrema

Applicant

Victoria Saduka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause exists for extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to justify the inordinate delay of more than three years; alleged misplacement of court file was unsupported; issues raised did not amount to illegality apparent on the face of the record; application dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to appeal is dismissed.
  • Applicant to pay costs.