ramadhani said omary vs republic 2023 tzca 17840 16 november 2023

ramadhani said omary vs republic 2023 tzca 17840 16 november 2023

The application for extension of time is misconceived because the rules do not permit a second review application on the same matter after the first has been determined; the decision on review is final.

Citation
ramadhani said omary vs republic 2023 tzca 17840 16 november 2023
Parties
Applicant: Ramadhani Said Omary; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Court Decisions, Finality of Judgments
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Court Decisions Finality of Judgments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramadhani Said Omary

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to extension of time to file a second review application after dismissal of the first review application
  2. 2 Whether the rules permit a second review application on the same matter

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time is misconceived because the rules do not permit a second review application on the same matter after the first has been determined; the decision on review is final.

Court Disposition

dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time is dismissed.