ramadhani tungu masanja vs zainabu athumani another 2023 tzhclandd 16596 24 may 2023

ramadhani tungu masanja vs zainabu athumani another 2023 tzhclandd 16596 24 may 2023

The applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay and did not account for each day of the 522-day delay as required by law. Negligence and lack of follow-up do not constitute good cause. The application for extension of time is without merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
ramadhani tungu masanja vs zainabu athumani another 2023 tzhclandd 16596 24 may 2023
Parties
Applicant: Ramadhani Tungu Masanja; 1st Respondent: Zainabu Athumani; 2nd Respondent: Salum Abdallah Mohamed (As Administrator of the Estate of the Late Abdallah Makongwa)
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Review of Judgment Limitation of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramadhani Tungu Masanja

Applicant

Zainabu Athumani

1st Respondent

Salum Abdallah Mohamed (As Administrator of the Estate of the Late Abdallah Makongwa)

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for review

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay and did not account for each day of the 522-day delay as required by law. Negligence and lack of follow-up do not constitute good cause. The application for extension of time is without merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs