NA TZHC DODOMA 1
The Ward Tribunal was properly constituted in accordance with statutory requirements; procedural informality did not cause injustice; evidence was sufficient to decide the dispute without visiting the locus in quo; appellant was not denied the right to call witnesses; appeal lacks merit.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- NA TZHC DODOMA 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Rashid A. Mninga; Respondent: Mwajuma Adamu
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Composition, Evidence Procedure, Right to Call Witnesses, Visit to Locus in Quo
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rashid A. Mninga
Appellant
Mwajuma Adamu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the composition of the Ward Tribunal was lawful
- 2 Whether the procedure for recording evidence was proper
- 3 Whether the appellant was denied the right to call witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The Ward Tribunal was properly constituted in accordance with statutory requirements; procedural informality did not cause injustice; evidence was sufficient to decide the dispute without visiting the locus in quo; appellant was not denied the right to call witnesses; appeal lacks merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment