rashid m nampiso vs jamila sururu others 2014 tzhclandd 47 5 september 2014

rashid m nampiso vs jamila sururu others 2014 tzhclandd 47 5 september 2014

The plaintiff was not lawfully allocated the disputed land as his documents were forged; the first defendant was lawfully allocated the land; revocation of plaintiff's offer was lawful; plaintiff entered as a trespasser and is not entitled to compensation or relief.

Citation
rashid m nampiso vs jamila sururu others 2014 tzhclandd 47 5 september 2014
Parties
Plaintiff: Rashid M. Nampiso; 1st Defendant: Jamila Sururu; 2nd Defendant: The Commissioner for Lands; 3rd Defendant: The Attorney General
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 September 2014
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Final Judgment
Outcome
case dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Allocation of Land, Revocation of Right of Occupancy, Forged Documents, Compensation for Improvements, Trespass
Source Language
English
Land Law Allocation of Land Revocation of Right of Occupancy Forged Documents Compensation for Improvements Trespass

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rashid M. Nampiso

Plaintiff

Jamila Sururu

1st Defendant

The Commissioner for Lands

2nd Defendant

The Attorney General

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff was lawfully allocated the suit land by the second defendant
  2. 2 Whether the first defendant was lawfully allocated the said suit premises by the second defendant
  3. 3 Whether the revocation of plaintiff’s title over the suit land by the second defendant was lawful

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was not lawfully allocated the disputed land as his documents were forged; the first defendant was lawfully allocated the land; revocation of plaintiff's offer was lawful; plaintiff entered as a trespasser and is not entitled to compensation or relief.

Court Disposition

case dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Plaintiff's case dismissed with costs
  • Plaintiff not entitled to any compensation