rashida muswadiku vs raymond pastory and two others 2021 tzhc 6527 24 september 2021
The applicant proved the attached land is matrimonial property and her family's livelihood wholly depends on it; therefore, it is non-attachable under Section 48(1)(d) of the Civil Procedure Code.
- Citation
- rashida muswadiku vs raymond pastory and two others 2021 tzhc 6527 24 september 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Rashida Muswadiku; 1st Respondent: Raymond Pastory; 2nd Respondent: Majemaje Auction Mart & Court Brokers; 3rd Respondent: Muswadiku Pastory
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Misc Civil Application / Objection Proceedings on Execution
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Attachment of Property, Matrimonial Property, Execution of Decree
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rashida Muswadiku
Applicant
Raymond Pastory
1st Respondent
Majemaje Auction Mart & Court Brokers
2nd Respondent
Muswadiku Pastory
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc Civil Application / Objection Proceedings on Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the attached land is matrimonial property and non-attachable under Civil Procedure Code
- 2 Whether the applicant's livelihood is wholly dependent upon the attached land
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant proved the attached land is matrimonial property and her family's livelihood wholly depends on it; therefore, it is non-attachable under Section 48(1)(d) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Attached farm released from attachment
- Decree Holder to identify other attachable properties for recovery
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment