20140523 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 20140523 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 23 May 2014
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 23 May 2014
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The offences charged are bailable and the court stands by the declaration of unconstitutionality of section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000; bail is granted subject to specified conditions.
Court disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs.2,000,000/=
- Each applicant to provide one reliable surety resident in Dar es Salaam with immovable property
- Applicants to surrender their travel documents to the Regional Crimes Officer, Dar es Salaam Zone
- Applicants restricted from leaving the country
02
Material facts
Parties
Razvan Pintile
Applicant Counsel: Daudi J. MalimaRobert Kraus
Applicant Counsel: Daudi J. MalimaThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Joseph PandeAmounts and remedies
- Bail Bond Per Applicant: TZS 2,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial in Economic Crime Case No. 18 of 2014
- 02
Whether section 36(1) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act is constitutional
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants argued that section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 is unconstitutional as declared in Costa Mahalu's case and that the offences are bailable.
- Respondent
- Respondent did not object to the application but requested the court to consider the requirements of section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 when setting bail conditions.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Procedure Act Cap. 20 R.E 2002
Offences charged are bailable under Tanzanian law.
- 02
Costa Mahalu case
Section 36(1) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act declared unconstitutional.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The offences charged are bailable and the court stands by the declaration of unconstitutionality of section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000; bail is granted subject to specified conditions.
Obiter and limits
- The court is mindful of the requirements of half the amount of the alleged loss as per section 36(1) of Cap. 200 R.E 2002, but maintains its unconstitutionality.
Court disposition
Bail granted
- Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs.2,000,000/=
- Each applicant to provide one reliable surety resident in Dar es Salaam with immovable property
- Applicants to surrender their travel documents to the Regional Crimes Officer, Dar es Salaam Zone
- Applicants restricted from leaving the country
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 23 May 2014
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 23 May 2014
· IN THE HIGH CORUT OFT ANZANIA [DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY]
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICANTION NO. 40 OF 2014 ( Originating from Economic Criminal Case No. 18 of 2014 Resident Magistrate's Court Kisutu at Kisutu) RAZV AN PINTILE .......................... 1 5 T APPLICANT ROBERT KRAUS ............................. 2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC ............................... RESPONDENT 23/5/2014 & 23/5/2014
RULING S. Bongole, J ·The application by the applicants naimely (1) RAZV AN PINTILE; (2) ROBERT KRAUS has been preferred under a certificate of urgency at the Instance of Mr. Daudi J. Malima learned Advocate. It is made under S. 148 (1), (2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Act Cap. 20 R.E 2002 where the applicants are praying for bail in respect of Economic Crime Case No. 18 of 2014 pending before the Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es salaam, at Kisutu against them. Page 1 of 3 It is supported by the affidavit deposed on by Mr. Daudi J. Malima le.arned Advocate of the High Court of Tanzania. Before the RM's Court, the applicants were jointly charged of 7 Counts. Six Counts under the Electronic and Postal Communications Act No. 9 of 2010 and one Count i.e (7th Count) under the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act Cap 200 R.E 2002). In essence, the Respondent/ Republic having been represented by Mr. Joseph Pande learned Senior State Attorney do not object the application. However, he pray this Count to take into account the requirements of S.36 (1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 in considering bail conditions. Mr. Mgongolwa learned Counsel for the applicants argued that the provisions of S. 36 (1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 are no longer good law as it was declared unconstitutional by this court in the celebrated case of Costa Mahalu' s (supra). It is trite that the offences under which
the applicants stand charged are bailable offences under our laws. I will therefore grant the applicants bail c:1s prayed. Page 2 of 3 I am mindfull of the requirements of ½ amount of the alleged loss as enshrined under s.36 (1) of Cap. 200 R. E 2002. This court has expressly and categorically declared the said section unconstitutional as per the Costa Mahalu Case (Supra). I stand by that position as of today that position has not changed. I will as I hereby do grant bail to the applicants on the following conditions: 1. The Applicants shall execute a bail bond. of the sum of Tshs.2,000,000/ = each.
2. Each Applicants shall have one reliable surety a Resident of the United Republic of Tanzania residing within Dar Region with an Immovable property.
3. The applicants must/ shall surrender their travelling documents (Passport) to the Regional Crimes officer (RCO) Dar es salaam Zone.
4. The Applicants are Restricted to move out of the Country Page 3 of 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.