Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

20140523 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offences charged are bailable and the court stands by the declaration of unconstitutionality of section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000; bail is granted subject to specified conditions.

Court disposition

Bail granted

Orders

  • Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs.2,000,000/=
  • Each applicant to provide one reliable surety resident in Dar es Salaam with immovable property
  • Applicants to surrender their travel documents to the Regional Crimes Officer, Dar es Salaam Zone
  • Applicants restricted from leaving the country

02

Material facts

Parties

Razvan Pintile

Applicant Counsel: Daudi J. Malima

Robert Kraus

Applicant Counsel: Daudi J. Malima

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Joseph Pande

Amounts and remedies

  • Bail Bond Per Applicant: TZS 2,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants argued that section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 is unconstitutional as declared in Costa Mahalu's case and that the offences are bailable.
Respondent
Respondent did not object to the application but requested the court to consider the requirements of section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 when setting bail conditions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Procedure Act Cap. 20 R.E 2002

    Offences charged are bailable under Tanzanian law.

  2. 02

    Costa Mahalu case

    Section 36(1) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act declared unconstitutional.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offences charged are bailable and the court stands by the declaration of unconstitutionality of section 36(1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000; bail is granted subject to specified conditions.

Obiter and limits

  • The court is mindful of the requirements of half the amount of the alleged loss as per section 36(1) of Cap. 200 R.E 2002, but maintains its unconstitutionality.

Court disposition

Bail granted

  • Each applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs.2,000,000/=
  • Each applicant to provide one reliable surety resident in Dar es Salaam with immovable property
  • Applicants to surrender their travel documents to the Regional Crimes Officer, Dar es Salaam Zone
  • Applicants restricted from leaving the country

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 23 May 2014

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 23 May 2014

20140523 TZHC Dar es Salaam

· IN THE HIGH CORUT OFT ANZANIA [DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY]

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICANTION NO. 40 OF 2014 ( Originating from Economic Criminal Case No. 18 of 2014 Resident Magistrate's Court Kisutu at Kisutu) RAZV AN PINTILE .......................... 1 5 T APPLICANT ROBERT KRAUS ............................. 2ND APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC ............................... RESPONDENT 23/5/2014 & 23/5/2014

RULING S. Bongole, J ·The application by the applicants naimely (1) RAZV AN PINTILE; (2) ROBERT KRAUS has been preferred under a certificate of urgency at the Instance of Mr. Daudi J. Malima learned Advocate. It is made under S. 148 (1), (2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Act Cap. 20 R.E 2002 where the applicants are praying for bail in respect of Economic Crime Case No. 18 of 2014 pending before the Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es salaam, at Kisutu against them. Page 1 of 3 It is supported by the affidavit deposed on by Mr. Daudi J. Malima le.arned Advocate of the High Court of Tanzania. Before the RM's Court, the applicants were jointly charged of 7 Counts. Six Counts under the Electronic and Postal Communications Act No. 9 of 2010 and one Count i.e (7th Count) under the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act Cap 200 R.E 2002). In essence, the Respondent/ Republic having been represented by Mr. Joseph Pande learned Senior State Attorney do not object the application. However, he pray this Count to take into account the requirements of S.36 (1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 in considering bail conditions. Mr. Mgongolwa learned Counsel for the applicants argued that the provisions of S. 36 (1) of Cap.200 R.E 2000 are no longer good law as it was declared unconstitutional by this court in the celebrated case of Costa Mahalu' s (supra). It is trite that the offences under which

the applicants stand charged are bailable offences under our laws. I will therefore grant the applicants bail c:1s prayed. Page 2 of 3 I am mindfull of the requirements of ½ amount of the alleged loss as enshrined under s.36 (1) of Cap. 200 R. E 2002. This court has expressly and categorically declared the said section unconstitutional as per the Costa Mahalu Case (Supra). I stand by that position as of today that position has not changed. I will as I hereby do grant bail to the applicants on the following conditions: 1. The Applicants shall execute a bail bond. of the sum of Tshs.2,000,000/ = each.

2. Each Applicants shall have one reliable surety a Resident of the United Republic of Tanzania residing within Dar Region with an Immovable property.

3. The applicants must/ shall surrender their travelling documents (Passport) to the Regional Crimes officer (RCO) Dar es salaam Zone.

4. The Applicants are Restricted to move out of the Country Page 3 of 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Costa Mahalu case

Case cited

Criminal Procedure Act Cap. 20 R.E 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Electronic and Postal Communications Act No. 9 of 2010

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Economic and Organised Crime Control Act Cap. 200 R.E 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.