real hope vision school vs bhoke makuru 2022 tzhcld 748 12 august 2022

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not show diligence; alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record; delay was inordinate and grounded in negligence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: real hope vision school vs bhoke makuru 2022 tzhcld 748 12 august 2022
Parties: Applicant: Real Hope Vision School; Respondent: Bhoke Makuru
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 12 August 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Delay in Filing, Labour Dispute
Source Language: english

Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Illegality as Ground for Extension Delay in Filing Labour Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Real Hope Vision School

Applicant

Bhoke Makuru

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether sufficient reason was shown for delay in filing notice of appeal
2 Whether alleged illegality in the prior judgment justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not show diligence; alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record; delay was inordinate and grounded in negligence.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

No order as to costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.