20181109 tzhc arusha

20181109 tzhc arusha

The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons or cogent evidence, such as a deed poll or affidavit sworn by the deceased, to justify rectification of the grant. The court found that the name on the death certificate and will should prevail.

Citation
20181109 tzhc arusha
Parties
Applicant/petitioner: Shushma Verma
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
9 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Names of Deceased, Probate Procedure
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shushma Verma

Applicant/petitioner

Procedural Posture

Misc. Civil Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the grant of probate can be rectified to include additional names of the deceased as used in various companies

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons or cogent evidence, such as a deed poll or affidavit sworn by the deceased, to justify rectification of the grant. The court found that the name on the death certificate and will should prevail.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for rectification of grant rejected