alexnder j barunguza vs law school of tanzania two others 2023 tzhc 23661 1 december 2023
The grounds advanced by the petitioner do not constitute sufficient convincing reasons for recusal; the allegations are based on misapprehension of facts and do not demonstrate inability to adjudicate impartially.
- Citation
- alexnder j barunguza vs law school of tanzania two others 2023 tzhc 23661 1 december 2023
- Parties
- Petitioner: Alexander J. Barunguza; 1st Respondent: Law School of Tanzania; 2nd Respondent: Hon. Judge Dr. Benhajj Shaaban Masoud; 3rd Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Recusal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Recusal of Judge, Apparent Bias, Judicial Impartiality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander J. Barunguza
Petitioner
Law School of Tanzania
1st Respondent
Hon. Judge Dr. Benhajj Shaaban Masoud
2nd Respondent
The Attorney General
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Recusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grounds advanced by the petitioner constitute sufficient reasons for recusal of the presiding judge
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds advanced by the petitioner do not constitute sufficient convincing reasons for recusal; the allegations are based on misapprehension of facts and do not demonstrate inability to adjudicate impartially.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- application for recusal is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment